How The Coronavirus Chicanery Was Foisted Upon The Public

The Motives

The Opportunity

The Means

Conclusion

Appendix A

Appendix B

Appendix C

The Motives

The conspirators had a great deal to gain from the coronavirus plot. For example, their insider foreknowledge of the panic about to come offered up the prospect of making vast fortunes by shorting oil futures and the stock markets. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) fell from 29,551 on February 12, 2020 down to 18,592 on March 23, less than six weeks later.

A certain 'gentleman' named George Soros made a profit of $1.5billion in September 1992 by betting against the pound during the "Black Wednesday" crisis, as the British government was forced to withdraw sterling from the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM).

For governments, there was the prospect of a large shift in power over to them from their citizens, as the mostly terrified populace became prepared to jettison their rights and freedoms and accept the imposition of varying restrictions, putatively in return for the government "protecting" them from a killer pandemic. Many people lacking in critical thinking skills would readily accept measures such as tracking apps, facial recognition cameras, vaccination certificates, and even microchip (or initially quantum dot dye) implants.

For leftist ecofreaks and man-made global warming fanatics, there would be a massive reduction in travel - especially air travel, and in use of fossil fuels, way beyond anything that could ever be achieved by Greta Thunberg and her mirthless cult followers protesting in shopping centres.

For a certain band of George Soros' co-religionist supremacists bent on establishing a New World Order based upon a world government headquartered in Jerusalem to rule over a compliant but enslaved population, this was a major step towards achieving their vile goal.

For vaccine and drug manufacturers, there was the strong possibility of greatly increased profits.

For the globalists, there was a chance of hitting Donald Trump's approval ratings.

And if the perps should fail to establish a 1984-style despotism on this occasion, then they have still succeeded in conducting a macabre social science experiment that provides data on how easily hysteria may be propagated by the mass media, and how many people are willing to give up their liberties without so much as a whimper.

The Opportunity

The opportunity didn't just arise spontaneously. The Covid con-trick wasn't a Let It Happen On Purpose (LIHOP) incident; it was a Make It Happen On Purpose (MIHOP) crime. As will be shown, the conspirators already knew in October 2019 what would be transpiring in 2020. They had the means to create the opportunity.

And the opportunity involved a scare about a flu-like virus pandemic, in which mass hysteria was whipped up by the same lying mainstream media that told us about Iraq having WMD, or about the Iraqis throwing Kuwaiti babies out of incubators, or about the 'evil' Assad regime "gassing" women and children at Douma, or about the Germans bayoneting Belgian babies and chopping off little children's hands in 1914. The media have been repeatedly caught faking the coronavirus 'crisis', for example when they aired footage of a hospital in Italy because they couldn't find one in New York City that was busy enough to fit in with their "overcrowded hospitals" narrative. And CBS News had medical professionals posing as 'patients', by lining up in their cars at a drive-through testing site in Michigan.

Most importantly, the top-level conspirators had the opportunity to peddle their germ hysteria thanks to their control of the mass media.

In Britain for example, the average number of annual flu deaths over the last four seasons for which there is complete data - 2014/15 to 2018/19 - is 21,000, with two of those years having between 25,000 and 30,000 fatalities. (See Appendix B.) And according to the government's own estimates, the "Hong Kong" flu outbreak of 1968/9 caused 80,000 "attributable excess mortality in the UK".

Yet there was no lockdown, no trashing of the economy, no shutting down of businesses, no creation of millions unemployed, no inane "social distancing" rules forcing people to line up just to buy groceries as in a failing communist nation, no mask-wearing hypochondriacs walking the streets, no closures of schools, bars, restaurants, leisure centres, etc..

The coronavirus swindle was based on two outrageous lies, namely:

1. The pretence that the "COVID-19" Case Fatality Rate (CFR) is ~1%, when in fact it is ~0.1% in line with seasonal flu.
2. The pretence that lockdown and "social distancing" measures can make a massive, two orders of magnitude difference for the better, i.e., 5,000 dead instead of 500,000, when in fact the lockdown causes hundreds of excess deaths daily in Britain alone.

Lie #1 is debunked by random testing of the general population for "COVID-19" antibodies, as was conducted in Santa Clara County for example, when the prevalence was found to be around 50 times higher than official figures for infections suggest. (See: Perspectives on the Pandemic, Episode 4, Dr. John Ioannidis.) This has been corroborated by other studies elsewhere, such as Los Angeles County.

The chicanery relies upon: a) vastly deflating the denominator by excluding millions of asymptomatic, mild or moderate infections, and b) inflating the numerator by counting deaths as due to coronavirus irrespective of whether the person died of it, or with it. The vast majority of deaths are amongst those with pre-existing conditions. In order to obtain the manipulated denominator, governments shy away from random testing and favour PCR tests for antigens among those unwell enough to seek medical help.

Lie #2 is refuted by the fact that Office for National Statistics weekly data already showed 12,765 excess deaths in England and Wales with no mention of COVID-19 on the death certificate in the first five full weeks of the lockdown; see Appendix C. And as of May 11, 2020, lockdown Britain had 473 COVID deaths per million of population compared with 323 dpm in Sweden and 14 dpm in Belarus, which both chose not to lockdown.

As the honest epidemiologist Dr. Knut Wittkowski says, in order for "social distancing" to make a two orders of magnitude difference, it would require everyone to be placed in a negative pressure room and isolated there. (See: Perspectives on the Pandemic, Dr. Knut Wittkowski, Episode 5, [18:47].)

Incidentally, the term "social distancing" was used in 2007 with reference to the flu.

The Means

This brings us to the details of how people living in "democratic" nations could be convinced to give up their rights and support various forms of lockdown. Convincing people in nations where citizens have limited human rights is one thing, but the perpetrators needed to impose their restrictions worldwide, or at least throughout most countries.

The pandemic began with an outbreak in Wuhan, China, and by March 13 there was some praise for China's "extraordinary measures" in quarantining tens of millions of people. The outbreak in Italy had prompted a lockdown there too, but the conspirators needed a much more global curb on liberties.

It was necessary for the pandemic to start in a nation like China, where human rights are given a relatively low priority. But in order to make the loss of freedoms last indefinitely for people worldwide, lockdowns had to be implemented at the point where the number of infections had got high enough for the curve to start to flatten, but well before herd immunity was attained.

For the coronavirus "COVID-19", the median time from illness onset to death is 18.5 days, and the median duration from exposure to symptoms onset (incubation period) is 5.1 days. Thus, there is a lag of about 24 days between the introduction of a new "social distancing" policy and its effect upon the daily death rate, and the UK's March 24 lockdown measures should have had their greatest effect around Friday April 17.

It's actually a little longer than that, since there is also the time taken for the deaths to be reported.

Yet even in the first few days of April, within one or two weeks of introduction of the lockdown, there was already a clear slowing of the increase in fatalities (see Appendix A). The daily percentage increase, when averaged out over the previous seven days to smooth out effects such as limited reporting at weekends, was already down from well over 30% to 20% and below. And it continued to decline over the next weeks, with no pronounced effect apparent around April 17.

This was because the lockdown had very little effect on the spread of infections - as would eventually be admitted after the disgraced, once highly influential "Professor Lockdown" went out of favour with the talking heads.

As Dr. Wittkowski says for example, the smart way to deal with a pandemic is to let it run its course until most of the population have been infected and herd immunity is acquired. In such a case, the epidemic in a particular nation would be over within three or four weeks, and the vulnerable such as the elderly in nursing homes could be protected by paying the staff overtime to remain on site for a few weeks. Given that the alternative strategy of lockdown cost the US economy around $2trillion and created tens of millions unemployed, $2trillion would pay for a helluva  lot of overtime.

By timing the lockdown as they did, the conspirators could trick people into believing that it was the lockdown, "social distancing" and restrictions that were responsible for declining infection and death rates, rather like the drug manufacturers can make people feel that their product is helping cure a common cold that would soon have improved regardless. And, because herd immunity had not been acquired, the conspirators could continue to cite the threat of a "deadly" "second wave" if society was allowed to return to the way it was before, i.e., relative normality.

For the emerging tyranny, the lockdown and "social distancing" denies the right to assembly and the right to travel (other than for relatively short trips) and prevents patriots from being able to mount any serious resistance. And by introducing a ritual of inane clapping for, and lionising of, health workers, most of the public is conditioned into believing that the government and its 'services' exist solely to "protect" them.

On October 18, 2019 in New York, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health conducted their Event 201 exercise, a tabletop simulation of a pandemic involving a novel coronavirus transmitted from bats to humans via an intermediate animal.

Thirty days later, on November 17, 2019, the first person in China's Hubei province was apparently infected by the novel coronavirus and contracted "COVID-19". Towards the end of December there were hundreds of cases, and Chinese doctors were recognising them as the novel coronavirus.

The following from Gates and chums' scenario shows how much of the 'simulation' is identical to the 2020 reality. The identical points are in bold type.  Note: the bold type accounts for 167 out of 284 words, i.e. 58.8%.

"...an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen and the disease it causes are modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.

The disease starts in pig farms in Brazil, quietly and slowly at first, but then it starts to spread more rapidly in healthcare settings. When it starts to spread efficiently from person to person in the low-income, densely packed neighborhoods of some of the megacities in South America, the epidemic explodes. It is first exported by air travel to Portugal, the United States, and China and then to many other countries. Although at first some countries are able to control it, it continues to spread and be reintroduced, and eventually no country can maintain control.

There is no possibility of a vaccine being available in the first year. There is a fictional antiviral drug that can help the sick but not significantly limit spread of the disease.

Since the whole human population is susceptible, during the initial months of the pandemic, the cumulative number of cases increases exponentially, doubling every week. And as the cases and deaths accumulate, the economic and societal consequences become increasingly severe.

The scenario ends at the 18-month point, with 65 million deaths. The pandemic is beginning to slow due to the decreasing number of susceptible people. The pandemic will continue at some rate until there is an effective vaccine or until 80-90 % of the global population has been exposed. From that point on, it is likely to be an endemic childhood disease."

It is clear that there are far too many similarities between the simulation and the reality for it to be explainable as merely yet another "bizarre coincidence", as was seen in numerous examples with 9/11 and the London 7/7 bombings, for example.

Human coronaviruses can be man-made. And in 2010 Pyrc et al successfully propagated the human coronavirus HKU1 for the first time in vitro, using human ciliated airway epithelial cell cultures.

Since the conspirators already knew in October 2019 that a novel zoonotic coronavirus was going to be transmitted from bats to humans and develop into a pandemic, and the scenario began within a month or two of their Event 201 simulation, the virus has to be man-made. And there are two prime suspects.

Sequencing of the COVID-19 genome had traced it back to bats found in Yunnan caves. And the Wuhan Institute of Virology, funded by a $3.7 million grant from the US National Institutes of Health, was conducting coronavirus experiments on bats captured more than 1,000 miles away in Yunnan. Scientists cultivated a coronavirus in a lab and injected it into three-day-old piglets.

Alternatively, the virus could have been created in Israel and exported to Wuhan.

Around March 21, 2020, "lots of dead bats" were found on the ground near the Gan Leumi urban park in Ramat Gan, a city east of Tel Aviv. Many of the bats were young and showed no signs of trauma, leaving experts baffled and citing improbable 'explanations' such as "cold weather" over the weekend. Others suggested it was fulfilling a "biblical prophecy".

The park area to the south of Ramat Gan is about one mile east of the Sheba Medical Center, as the bat flies. The Sheba Medical Center includes facilities such as the Israel National Center for Health Policy and Epidemiology Research, and is the main clinical trial venue for medical scientific studies conducted by the Weizmann Institute of Science. Also sited at Sheba is the Tel Hashomer Medical Research, Infrastructure and Services Ltd., whose work includes animal modeling of human diseases.

However, the strongest suspect is the rather more sinister Israel Institute for Biological research (IIBR). It's located at Ness Ziona, barely more than ten miles by car from the urban park.

On March 18, 2020, scientists at the IIBR were said to have made "significant breakthroughs in understanding [the new] coronavirus" (that was found to have come from bats), and were expected to announce in the coming days that a vaccine for COVID-19 had been developed.

Those dead bats might have been used in legitimate coronavirus research and vaccine development. However, if the virus was created in Israel rather than China, it avoids the need for Chinese conspirators, and avoids the need for crooked Americans to send their instructions on to China. And if knowledge of the virus's bioengineered origin becomes widespread, the perpetrators can still set up the Chinese to take the blame.

As to the question of the virus's natural or man-made origin, suppose the perpetrators stand to make billions of dollars, as well as furthering their diabolical political agenda. Then which makes the most sense: (a) Wait (and hope) for a new flu virus to emerge and precipitate a pandemic at some unknown future time, and then have their mass media foment mass hysteria? (b) Invest a few million dollars in bat coronavirus research, arrange for an 'outbreak' by releasing a virus in a country like China, and then have their mass media foment mass hysteria?

Whether of Israeli or (US-backed) Chinese origin, the pathogen could have been tested on humans who were unwittingly exposed. For example, Chinese prisoners or Israeli Arabs.

So, the virus is created, then released in Wuhan or Hubei province, smeared onto door handles, etc., and goes on to create a pandemic.

Let's go back a few days to around the middle of March as mentioned above, when the conspirators need to impose lockdowns and restrictions across as much of the globe as they can. And here the dodgy professor Neil Ferguson (with the leftist eco-activist 'mistress' Antonia Staats) comes into play and massages his stats as required. Ferguson used to be known as "Professor Lockdown"; now he's "Professor Pantsdown".

Ferguson's group the "Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium" is funded by the Gates Foundation, which also conducts research into coronavirus vaccines and stands to profit from the vaccine manufacturing business.

The Gates Foundation also funds research at MIT into a way of 'microchipping' people, by using patches to administer a dye containing copper-based quantum dots, that stores information such as the 'patient's' medical record and emits near-infra red light that can be read from a smartphone with the infra-red filter removed.

Update: On Monday May 4, 2020, Benjamin Netanyahu proposed fitting people - in particular, children - with "microchip" sensors as Israel's lockdown is lifted. Ostensibly, this technology would sound a warning if two individuals got too close and broke the 2 metre "social distancing" rule. In reality, it is obvious that the coronavirus hoax was a ruse to bring in satanic Orwellian agendas such as microchipping of people as if they were cattle or pets. And anyone who knows anything about 9/11 or the London 7/7 'suicide' bombings will be aware that Netanyahu played a central role in masterminding both atrocities.

Netanyahu would have taken a keen interest in the MIT "microchipping" research. He is an MIT alumnus, and it was his B.Sc. in architecture from MIT, along with access to blueprints of the WTC - either from his close friend Larry Silverstein, who built the original WTC7 in 1987, or from Lewis M. Eisenberg, a member of the Planning Board of UJA/United Jewish Federation and the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey who was to oversee the privatization of the WTC, that qualified Netanyahu as the principal mastermind of the 9/11 false-flag terror operation. He had the skills and the information that would enable him to calculate that it was necessary to take out five contiguous floors in a WTC Tower before the lack of bracing would raise the slenderness ratio of enough core columns above the critical slenderness ratio, such that Euler buckling and global collapse of the tower would ensue.

But there's enough material there for a very lengthy article.

Back to Ferguson aka Professor Pantsdown, and his paper claims around 2.2 million dead in the US and 510,000 in the UK, reducing to less than 10,000 if sufficient social distancing restrictions, i.e., a lockdown, are imposed.

Neil Ferguson's results are wrong because they are based on the two lies described above:

• he assumes 0.9% as his "Infection Fatality Ratio" aka Case Fatality Rate, when in fact the true figure is around 0.1% in line with the flu, as confirmed by random testing that shows the virus is around 50 times more prevalent than assumed by the official figures.
• he predicts 510,000 dead in the UK, 81% of the UK population infected, so 67.8 million x 0.81 = 54,918,000 infected, and assuming CFR of 0.9% would be 494,262 dead. So his CFR here is 0.929%.
• he assumes "social distancing" measures can make a two orders of magnitude difference to the outcome, i.e, ~500,000 or ~5,000 deaths, whereas this assumption has been ridiculed by honest epidemiologists such as Dr. Wittkowski.

An alternative study from Sunetra Gupta et al, University of Oxford, suggests that there could already have been a significant level of herd immunity built up in the UK population by the second half of March, and COVID reached the UK by mid-January at the latest or even December.

But it gets even better. Sweden's government never panicked and imposed a lockdown policy; it imposed a much milder mitigation strategy that didn't wreck the economy, and didn't keep the threat of a "deadly second wave" hanging over its citizens like a sword of Damocles. Professor Pantsdown's model predicted that under the current Swedish government's response, Sweden would have 40,000 coronavirus deaths by the first week of May, rising to nearly 100,000 by June.

So let's compare what actually happened with the professor's prediction. Did we see 40,000 Covid deaths in Sweden? As of May 6, 2020, Sweden's total coronavirus deaths stood at 2,941. Pantsdown's prediction was off by an order of magnitude.

A major flaw with Professor Ferguson and Imperial College's model was that it assumed that voluntary "social distancing" would make very little difference to the spread of the virus, whereas a lockdown would be a game-changer. According to Ferguson, Sweden's voluntary distancing policy would maintain the R number (i.e., how many people that each infected person goes on to infect) at around 3 or 4, leading to an increasing number of infections, but a lockdown would slash it to well below 1, so that the number of infections decreases.

In fact, Sweden's R number was estimated at 0.85 around the end of April, which compares to the corresponding estimate of 0.8 for the UK with a greater error bound.

Dr. Knut Wittkowski does not believe that Neil Ferguson's colossal 'blunder' about 510,000 dead in Britain and 2.2 million in the US could have been an "honest mistake".

Beginning in 2011, Bill Gates met the child sex trafficker and pervert Jeffrey Epstein "on numerous occasions", and in March 2013 Gates flew on Epstein's Gulfstream plane. Six months later, Gates and Epstein met for dinner and discussed the Gates Foundation and philanthropy.

The modus operandi of Epstein, who allegedly killed himself - allegedly being the operative word, was clearly to lure rich and famous people with tales of being able to provide extraordinary levels of finance for "philanthropic" projects, then to provide them with underage girls, so that they could be blackmailed into helping advance the globalists' diabolical satanic agenda. Bribery was not an option with billionaires, and so other methods were necessary.

The group that controls the mass media, and that originally set up and now controls the Federal Reserve Bank, and by extension has 'democratic' governments in its pocket, is the same group of which the late Jeffrey Epstein was a member (along with other perverts such as Roman Polanski, "Lord" Greville Janner, Rabbi Baruch Lebovits, Yosef Ederi, David Seff, Naftolis Schwartz, David Zimmer, Alexander Rogalsky, Simeon Osen, Anthony Weiner, Harvey Weinstein, etc.).

In March 1893, The New York Times wrote, "Owing to the leading position of the Jews in the money markets of Europe...". For some, that's taking honesty too far. In 1896, Adolph Ochs, of Jewish descent, acquired The New York Times. Nowadays, the Jews themselves love to remind everyone about all the "Jews In The American Media". The situation is the same in Britain, for example, where the Jews admit they were already "a major factor in British journalism" by the middle of the 19^th century.

Here are a few "Jews In The American Media", from the hyperlink above:

Source: SimpleToRemember.com

(That's only a tiny sample of those listed on that page alone.) Some sceptics might be asking, "Is SimpleToRemember.com a 'conspiracy' website that has made this up?" Apart from the fact that the information can be verified, anyone who checks out the site will immediately see that it is a pro-Judaism website.

These are the puppeteers at the top level who are attempting to turn the world into a giant prison camp ruled from a Greater "Israel". A world where people are implanted with microchips and tracked with satellites, drones, facial recognition and mobile apps. The ultimate controllers are the same group that murdered 3,000 people in cold blood on 9/11/01 and blamed it on the Muslims, as casus belli for a series of wars against Muslim nations. The same group that lied about WWII and spent the next 75 years peddling a malicious, colossal libel against White European people whilst pretending to be the 'victim', so they could use it as a get out of jail free card and carte blanche to carry out all manner of atrocities and perversions. The same group that claimed: "Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel. [...] Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat… That is why gentiles were created."

On February 1, 2020, a new CEO was installed at the Gates Foundation - Mark Suzman, a Jew.

The same group controls social media such as Facebook and YouTube, so they get to censor viewpoints that don't conform to their globalist agenda.

And so this unholy alliance of speculators, power-hungry officials, global warming cultists, globalists, pharmaceutical companies, blackmailed stooges and Jewish supremacists collaborated to whip up mass hysteria about a virus.

Conclusion

We are at a pivotal point in mankind's history. The perverts, parasites and psychopaths, aided by puppets and incompetents, are trying to impose a grotesque despotism in which the public give up their rights and liberties in return for a misplaced hope that the government is somehow trying to protect them.

As of early May, it should have been quite obvious to any policymaker that the lockdown strategy was a terrible mistake, and that continuing to trash the economy because of an outbreak of a virus that is no more lethal than the flu is nothing other than gross imbecility. Honest scientists, who weren't funded by the Gates Foundation or some other corrupt organisation, admitted that stay-at-home orders and shutting all non-essential businesses had very little effect on fighting the virus. Others had finally managed to deduce what the rest of us knew long ago, that Britain's COVID-19 outbreak had already peaked and started to decline before the lockdown began.

The longer regimes continue to spout balderdash about gradual easing of restrictions because they are afraid of a "second wave" of infections, the more evidence that their agenda is very much at odds with the wellbeing and liberty of their citizens. And the stronger the case that such regimes should be overturned, and the leaders arrested and charged with crimes against humanity.

Appendix A

Source: Worldometers.info and DHSC

Appendix B

Flu deaths in the UK.

Source: Table 7, Surveillance of influenza and other respiratory viruses in the UK (Flu Annual Report) Winter 2018 to 2019

Appendix C

Week 13 is the week ending Friday March 27. The UK's lockdown began on Tuesday March 24, so its full effect does not show up until at least week 14. These are figures for England and Wales only.

Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

Take Our World Back! home page